because they were smaller. and the were also more poorer.and got attacked by invadors.
the western part of rome was weaker because the trading routes where to far.
there was no boreds.
They were weaker because they were smaller, poorer, they didnt pay their army men well so they were less likely to fight for their empire.
The western empire was weaker then the eastern empire because the western empire didn't have as much protection. The eastern empire had a bigger army and the trading routes were closer.
three reasons why the westren roman empire was that they were smaller. they were completely poorer so they couldnt make to many weapons. and the main reson is that the western empire was fewer in people.
I think the western Romans were weaker because the Easter Romans were larger in numbers and the western Romans were not getting payed enough.
they were weaker and poor and they didnt pay their army they were also smaller.
The trade routes were to far , the army was weak and poor, the smaller the city the more raids.
Well first off they were weaker then the eastern roman empire and they were extremely pooper than the eastern Roman Empire and they get attacked more oven than the eSstern Roman Empire.
They were weaker cuz they didn't have a strong army, they didn't have a lot of population,and they were weaker on one of their sides so it was eaiser for eniemies to invade them,and they also had less food.
because they where smaller and more poorer and they would get invaded they didnt have a good army and where weaker
The Western Roman Empire was weaker than the Eastern Roman Empire because the Western Empire consisted of smaller, weaker cities, it had few trade routes, it was much poorer than the Eastern Empire, and because its defense forces were much weaker. The Eastern Roman Empire was much more wealthy and protected. Due to the Western Roman Empire's weaknesses, it was the first to be invaded and the first side to fall.
They were poorer weaker and smaller and they didnt pay there army.
they were much smaller, poorer, and did not as great of an army.
The western Empire cities not close to trade routes,and there smaller and poorer. The defense forces were often poorly paid,so less willing to risk lives. so they were just poor and they had less stuff conpard to the wealthy east empire.So the wealthy east had lots more than the weaker west.
The Western Roman Empier is weaker and also has smaller cities. It's poor and doesn't have a great army. That's why it's weaker.
The reason why the western Rome was weaker than the Eastern Rome was for the ecconimy. For staters the people were poor and not having a natural brrier wasn't any good. The trading route was father away and the army was weak. The are several other reasons but those are a few.
Because they were farther away from trade routes also they were more vulnerable to attacks on their northern side of there place.
The reasons that the reasons that the Western Roman Empire was weaker than the Eastern Roman Empire was because it was smaller. The Western Roman Empire was poor. The Western Roman Empire had smaller army.
Remember when you are absent to visit this page to make up your sparks.